If you were an American law enforcement officer, say a city police officer, who was sworn to uphold the US Constitution and the Constitution of your state and to enforce your state’s criminal code, and you knew that You are plotting a conspiracy to rob a bank in your city, are you preparing to arrest the perpetrators before they robbed the bank and caused serious harm to innocent people? Also, if you knew that the perpetrators were known criminals with long criminal histories full of crimes and misdemeanors, would you try to act quickly to prevent the crime from happening? However, what if your watch commander and even your police chief told you to stand down when you informed them of the incontrovertible facts about the impending crime, when it was going to happen, how it would happen, and on the specific day? and time? What if, however, you were told that it didn’t matter and to just forget about it?
To answer these poignant questions, I will specifically point to an article that appeared on the front page of the August 2, 2014 edition of the “Washington Post” titled “Obama Prepares Executive Action on Immigration.” This article, from the most propaganda Marxist newspaper in the country, flippantly published this excuse for journalism with the same disregard for the US Constitution as when they announced that the great (illegal) bill, Obamacare, was on the president’s desk. to sign. The article should instead have the correct title, “Obama plans high crime to issue illegal and unconstitutional executive order granting amnesty to further denigrate the US Constitution. Why is this so?”
Well, the most compelling reason is that executive orders are not mentioned in the United States Constitution. They are an abstruse creation of the Supreme Court of the United States. Article 2 in no way gives the president the authority to hold the legislative, executive, and judicial powers in one hand and a whip in the other. The President, as chief executive, has only the specific power to issue directives, not laws, which affect only the employment status of executive branch employees. He has no power to unilaterally create a law (equivalent to a US statute or code), to define and interpret its legal status, and to enforce it. That is the precise definition of pure tyranny.
Remember the infamous executive order issued by America’s first real Führer, Franklin D. Roosevelt, when he ordered, in late 1941, that all innocent Japanese Americans be rounded up and incarcerated in internment camps? That order was later declared unconstitutional by the US Supreme Court, as it should have been before it was issued. That order was responsible for more than 100 deaths in those internment camps and ruined quite a few human lives. Something very terrible, after 1929, happened to most Americans when they were exposed to the severe adversity of a Depression deliberately engineered by the Federal Reserve, in 1927, when it secretly ordered that 1/3 of the paper and coins in circulation are gradually taken out of circulation (the economist Milton Friedman establishes this fact). By 1929, the nation’s savings and loan and bank runs were imminent. Then, when it happened, the people of the United States surrendered to socialism, government regulation, and the philosophies of John Maynard Keynes, which were implemented by FDR in his unconstitutional New Deal. People traded their precious freedom to the federal government for temporary physical safety, thinking FDR was a savior instead of the devil he was. There were at that time some American constitutional patriots who fought against Roosevelt, but through FDR’s conspiracy and deceitful collusion, proven through detailed historical research, they lost the fight.
Amazingly, the first executive order was issued by good old President George Washington when he took it upon himself to do Congress’s job by ordering the construction of the first federal mint. Congress should have criticized Washington and told him never to assume legislative power that rightfully belongs to Congress. However, Washington was not reprimanded (it was, for some reason, extolled) for its usurpation of the US Constitution, and it was unconstitutionally established that a president has the power to issue “executive orders”. However, the old but true aphorism, “give ’em an inch, and they’ll take a mile” was exemplified by that fact, and has been increasingly true over the course of history since the first illegal order was given.
Now, going back to illegal immigration, there are US laws, codes, that have been approved by plural congresses (Democrats and Republicans) and signed by sitting US presidents, dating back to Harry Truman, that make illegal immigration in the United States States, across US borders, a crime and prosecutable by federal law enforcement. Under current law, any federal law enforcement officer may be involved in the commission of a federal crime, such as bank robbery, kidnapping, shoplifting, and illegal immigration. If he deliberately does not intervene in the robberies or kidnappings, he cannot claim, as an excuse for not intervening, that it was not his jurisdiction. This applies to all federal law enforcement officers, the FBI, US Marshall Service, DEA, ATF, etc. For example, if an armed or unarmed US Border Patrol officer or INS (ICE) agent witnesses a DC bank robbery, kidnapping, shoplifting, or illegal immigration act, he or she has the authority to intervene, stop the crime and arrest the perpetrators. If an FBI agent, by any chance, witnesses a van loaded with illegal aliens, from Tijuana, Mexico, unloading in Chula Vista, California, they have the jurisdiction to intervene and arrest the aliens and turn them over to the US Border Patrol. This is as reasonable as a deputy sheriff’s duty to have the jurisdiction to enforce any and all state laws in any city in that county where the local police do not witness crimes being committed. The object of law enforcement, federal, state, and local, is to maintain the public peace and safety for residents of the States who are United States citizens, by the proper enforcement of all laws, federal, state, and local, legislated and enacted for the public good. When these laws are deliberately not enforced, the peace and security of the People, for which they were intended, diminish in proportion to the diminution of the law. I believe this is what the Honorable John Adams meant when he solemnly said, “We are a nation of laws, and not of men.”
So, at the beginning of this essay, I asked what you, an American peace officer, would do if you knew that a sordid federal crime, a felony, had been planned and when it was going to be perpetrated. If you also knew that federal law enforcement officials, sworn to uphold the US Constitution and enforce all applicable federal laws, were going to wait and allow the crime to take place, what would you do? I have some associates who are federal law enforcement officers, the FBI and the US Border Patrol, and some associates who are attorneys for the Department of Justice. And you know what? They don’t give a shit if the US president is committing serious crimes; and what a shame! These federal bigwigs are far more interested in maintaining an illegal status quo, to continue to receive their paychecks and pensions, than they are in the rule of law. They all bow to their boss, Eric Holder, and say, “Your command, which is your Führer’s command, is my wish to enforce.” Would you, a sworn peace officer, throw up your hands and say, “There’s nothing I can do?” Or would you do something, maybe something a little drastic?
Of course, what you would have to do is first come to a conclusion as to whether the issuance of an unconstitutional executive order is essentially equivalent to committing a bank robbery, murder, or kidnapping. Let’s go back, for a moment, to FDR and consider a blatant correlation that cries out for recognition. When that fascist president illegally ordered the internment of over a million Japanese Americans, American citizens, and some of those people died during their internment, did that order amount to a felony? Were those deaths the result of manslaughter or murder being committed by Roosevelt’s henchmen? When American citizens suffer directly, to the point of death, through the issuance of unconstitutional executive orders, shouldn’t something drastic be done? Will Obama’s order granting amnesty to illegal aliens, in direct violation of federal law, cause the people of the United States (residents of his state) to suffer from crime, joblessness, and deliberately designed social disorder (the 70th percent of violent crimes in San Diego are committed by Hispanic illegal aliens)? My belief is, and forever will be, that when existing federal, state, or local laws are discarded, nullified, ignored, and unenforced by top law enforcement officials and their direct enforcers, anarchy will prevail, demands that system, allowing such absence of law, to be abolished and institute a new system that ensures the benefits of liberty and freedom for the People. This is just the resource declared in that blessed document that was the foundation of American Republican government, the Declaration of Independence.